Disposed

Hanish Bamba and Anr. v. State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand HC2 Apr 2025C528/391/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal miscellaneous application under Section 528 BNSS sought quashing of summoning order, charge-sheet and entire proceedings in a dowry/cruelty case following a compromise between the parties. After verification by the Uttarakhand Legal Services Authority, the compounding application was allowed and proceedings were quashed qua the petitioners.

What the court decided

AI extract

SL. No.	Date	Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures	COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
			C-528 No. 391 of 2025 Hon’ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J. Mr. Shariq Khurshid, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned D.A.G. for the State. 3. Mr. Prince Chauhan, learned counsel for the respondent no.2/complainant. 4. This criminal misc. application is filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. by the petitioners/accused for quashing of the summoning/cognizance order dated 25.08.2020, charge-sheet dated 10.07.2020 as well as the entire criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No. 6182 of 2020_(F.I.R. No. 0142 of 2020),titled as “State vs. Hanish Bamba and Another”pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 & 506 of IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar qua the petitioners/accused, in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties. 5. In view of the fact that a Compounding Application(IA No. 01 of 2025)was filed by the parties before this Court, this Court vide order dated 26.03.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Member Secretary, Uttarakhand State Legal Services Authority in order to get their statements recorded and to verify the compromise deed. 6. Pursuant to such order, Member Secretary, Uttarakhand State Legal Services Authority has submitted his report dated 26.03.2025 which clearly indicates that the parties have settled the dispute amicably and have also verified the contents of the compromise. 7. In view of the above, Compounding Application(IANo.1 of 2025)_is allowed. As a

SL.
No.

Date

Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

C-528 No. 391 of 2025
Hon’ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.
Mr. Shariq Khurshid, learned counsel for
the petitioners.
2.
Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned D.A.G. for the
State.
3.
Mr. Prince Chauhan, learned counsel for
the respondent no.2/complainant.
4.
This criminal misc. application is filed
under
Section
528
of
B.N.S.S.
by
the
petitioners/accused
for
quashing
of
the
summoning/cognizance order dated 25.08.2020,
charge-sheet dated 10.07.2020 as well as the
entire criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No.
6182 of 2020_(F.I.R. No. 0142 of 2020),titled as
“State vs. Hanish Bamba and Another”pending
in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Kashipur, District Udham Singh
Nagar under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 & 506 of
IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act,
P.S. Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar qua
the
petitioners/accused,
in
view
of
the
compromise arrived at between the parties.
5.
In view of the fact that a Compounding
Application(IA No. 01 of 2025)was filed by the
parties before this Court, this Court vide order
dated 26.03.2025 had directed the parties to
appear
before
the
Member
Secretary,
Uttarakhand State Legal Services Authority in
order to get their statements recorded and to
verify the compromise deed.
6.
Pursuant to such order, Member Secretary,
Uttarakhand State Legal Services Authority has
submitted his report dated 26.03.2025 which
clearly indicates that the parties have settled the
dispute amicably and have also verified the
contents of the compromise.
7.
In view of the above, Compounding
Application(IANo.1 of 2025)_is allowed. As a

consequence thereof, the summoning/cognizance
order dated 25.08.2020, charge-sheet dated
10.07.2020 as well as the entire criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No. 6182 of 2020 (F.I.R. No. 0142 of 2020),titled as“State vs.
_Hanish Bamba and Another”_pending in the
court of learned Additional Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 & 506 of IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act,
P.S. Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar is hereby quashed qua the petitioners. 8. Present petition u/s 528 of B.N.S.S. is, thus, disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. (Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.) 02.04.2025 Akash

consequence thereof, the summoning/cognizance

order dated 25.08.2020, charge-sheet dated

10.07.2020 as well as the entire criminal
proceedings of Criminal Case No. 6182 of 2020
(F.I.R. No. 0142 of 2020),titled as“State vs.

_Hanish Bamba and Another”_pending in the

court of learned Additional Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Kashipur, District Udham Singh
Nagar under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 & 506 of
IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act,

P.S. Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar is
hereby quashed qua the petitioners.
8.
Present petition u/s 528 of B.N.S.S. is,
thus, disposed of in terms of the compromise
arrived at between the parties.
(Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.)
02.04.2025
Akash

Hanish Bamba and Anr. v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Hanish Bamba and Anr. v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Buddha Singh and Ors. Vs State of Uttarakhand

Sameer Ahmad Vs Sana Shah

Deepak Agarwal Vs Navdeep Nagalia

Neeraj Kumar Vs Narendra Narula

Smt. Babita and Others Vs State of Uttarakhand

Beer Singh Vs Bhagwan Singh Thapa