Dismissed
Mohd. Kamal (minor) v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCC482/1564/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or…
What the court decided
AI extract
Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| No. | Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| C-482 No. 1564 of 2017 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. |
|||
| Mr. M.K. Ray, learned counsel for the applicant. |
|||
| 2. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State. |
|||
| 3. Learned counsel for the applicant makes a statement at the Bar that the juvenile has been acquitted by the Juvenile Justice Board. Hence, no cause of action survives in the matter. 4. In view of the above submission, the present C-482 application stands dismissed, as having been rendered infructuous. |
|||
| (Alok Mahra J.) 07.08.2025 Ujjwal |
Applicant
State
Alok Mahra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court