The High Court dismissed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as infructuous since the trial concluded and applicants were acquitted, transferring no peculiar question of law to this bench.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2025:UHC:6868
| SL. No. |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| C482/1115/2017 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Shivam Raturi proxy counsel for Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal,learned counsel for the applicants. 2. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy A.G. for the State. 3. Ms. Nancy Singh proxy counsel for Mr. S.K. Shandilya, learned counsel for respondent no.2. 4. .Learned counsel for the applicants would submit that the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has become infructuous, as the trial has since concluded and the applicants have been acquitted. Therefore, nothing survives for adjudication. 5. In view of the above, the C-482 application is dismissed as infructuous. (Alok Mahra, J.) 05.08.2025 Mamta |
2025:UHC:6868
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Section 482 Cr.P.C. application survives after trial conclusion and acquittal of applicants.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shailendra Nauriyal
State
S.K. Shandilya
Alok Mahra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
