Bachchan v. State of Uttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
This order does not decide any matter of general application; it is a routine dismissal of a withdrawn bail application.
This order does not decide any matter of general application; it is a routine dismissal of a withdrawn bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| BA1 No. 251 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Susheel Kumar, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, D.A.G. for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the bail application. Permission is accorded. The bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. |
|||
| (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 04.03.2025 Jitendra |
Gaurav Singh
State
Ravindra Maithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court