Prem Vishwash v. State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand HC1 Dec 2025BA1/2277/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail granted; BA1 No. 2277 of 2025; Rakesh Thapliyal J.; applicant Prem Vishwas s/o Tapan Vishwas; FIR No. 242 of 2025 dated 12.08.2025, P.S. Transit Camp, District U.S. Nagar; charges under Sections 109, 190 and 191(2) BNS 2023 with Section 3/25 Arms Act; prima facie no intention to commit crime per FIR; grievous injuries; investigation ongoing; parity with co-accused interim protection in WPCRL No. 1288 of 2025; release on personal bond with two sureties; no opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Applicant Prem Vishwas to be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. ¶¶2 (item 8)

Prem Vishwash Vs State of Uttarakhand — Uttarakhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

SL. No.	Date	Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures	COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
			BA1 No. 2277 of2025 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. (Through V.C.)
			1. Mr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned A.G.A.with Ms. Rangoli Purohit, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Present applicant Prem Vishwas, S/o Tapan Vishwas is praying for bail in relation to FIR dated 12.08.2025, registered as FIR No. 242 of 2025 at P.S. Transit Camp District U.S. Nagar wherein the present applicant along with unknown persons has been implicated and charge sheeted for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 190 and 191(2) of BNS 2023 read with Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated, and, in fact, from the contents of the FIR there was no any intention or motive on the part of the applicant to commit the offence and they all are friends and in a drunken condition at the time of alleged incident. It is also argued that the applicant has no previous criminal history and one of the co-accused granted interim protection by the Coordinate Bench in WPCRL No. 1288 of 2025.
			5. On the previous date, the State Counsel was directed to get instructions

¶2

and today on instructions, Mr. Pratiroop
Pandey, learned A.G.A. apprise to this
Court that the injuries are grievous in
nature and the investigation is still going
on, however, he has not disputed this
fact
that
other
co-accused
granted
interim protection by the Coordinate
Bench.
6.
Be that as it may, on perusal of the
FIR, prima facie, it appears that there is
no any such intention to commit the
crime,
therefore,
taking
into
consideration all these aspects this Court
is of the view that the applicant deserves
for bail.
7.
Accordingly, without expressing any
opinion on the merits of the case, the
bail application is allowed.
8.
Let the applicant Prem Vishwas be
released on bail on his executing a
personal bond and furnishing two reliable
sureties of the like amount to the
satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
01.12.2025
Parul

Prem Vishwash v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prem Vishwash v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sharifa Baigum Vs State of Uttarakhand

Kuldeep Nandrajog Vs State of Uttarakhand

Mohammed Rafi Vs State of Uttarakhand

Kuldeep Nandrajog Vs State of Uttarakhand

Surendra Kumar Vs State of Uttarakhand

Ahsan Vs State of Uttarakhand