Bail application dismissed as infructuous after counsel for the applicant stated that the application had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 2025:UHC:2463 |
|---|---|---|---|
| BA1 No.1889 of 2024 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. |
|||
| Mr. Ravi Shankar Kandpal, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Vipul Painuli, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the instant bail application has become infructuous, therefore, the same may be dismissed as infructuous. 4. In view of the above statement, bail application is dismissed as infructuous. |
|||
| (Ashish Naithani, J.) 03.04.2025 Arti |
Ashish Naithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
