Allowed

Kuldeep Nandrajog v. State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand HC13 Oct 2025BA1/1813/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In the High Court of Uttarakhand, Justice Alok Kumar Verma allowed a bail application filed by Kuldeep Nandrajog. The court held that there was no reason to keep the applicant in custody indefinitely and ordered his release on bail requiring a personal bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was released on bail by executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties.

Kuldeep Nandrajog Vs State of Uttarakhand — Cheating and Forgery | Uttarakhand HC (2025)

¶1

2025:UHC:9089

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

¶3

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

¶4

13^th OCTOBER, 2025

¶5

FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1813 of 2025

¶6

Kuldeep Nandrajog ..…Applicant

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent

¶9

Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Sharang Dhulia, Advocate. (through video conferencing) Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, Brief Holder.

¶10

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

¶11

Applicant-Kuldeep Nandrajog is in judicial

¶12

custody for the offence punishable under Section 420 and Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in Case Crime No.167 of 2024, registered at Police Station Bahadarabad, District Haridwar.

¶13

2. The informant Narendra Kumar Rastogi lodged the First Information Report against three persons including the present applicant on 11.04.2024 alleging that he had invested a sum of Rs.11,26,000/for a plot with M/S Octagon Builders and Promoters Private Ltd. The builder has not yet handed over the plot to him. Now, he is allotting undeveloped plot.

¶14

¶15

2025:UHC:9089

¶16

3. Heard Mr. Sharang Dhulia, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, learned Brier Holder for respondent.

¶17

4. Mr. Sharang Dhulia, Advocate, contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present matter. The informant was dealt with by Vibhu Vishwabandhu, the director of the company, and the entire responsibility of selling the plot was of Vibhu Vishwabandhu. Applicant had no connection with the sale of the plot to the informant. He had not cheated the informant. He had not received any amount from the informant. The company has gone under liquidation. The matter is pending before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi. Applicant is in custody for a long period. The co-accused has been granted bail by the District and Sessions Judge, Haridwar. Applicant is a permanent resident of Delhi, therefore, there is no possibility of his absconding. Charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

¶18

5 . Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, Brief Holder, has opposed the bail application orally.

¶19

6. Bail is the rule and committal to jail is an exception. Refusal of bail is a restriction on the

¶20

¶21

2025:UHC:9089

¶22

personal liberty of the individual, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The object of keeping the accused person in detention during the trial is not punishment. The main purpose is manifestly to secure the attendance of the accused.

¶23

7. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, no reason is found to keep the applicant behind the bars for an indefinite period, therefore, without expressing any opinion as to the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage.

¶24

8. The Bail Application is allowed.

¶25

9. Let the applicant- Kuldeep Nandrajog be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

¶26

___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.

¶27

Date: 13.10.2025 Pant/

¶28

Kuldeep Nandrajog v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kuldeep Nandrajog v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jitendra Sah Vs Mukesh Pandey

Kuldeep Nandrajog Vs State of Uttarakhand

Kuldeep Nandrajog Vs State of Uttarakhand

Dinesh Kumar Vs State of Uttarakhand

Kuldeep Nandrajog Vs State of Uttarakhand

Monu Khan and Others Vs State of Uttarakhand