Dismissed
Sandeep v. Chesta Kalra
Uttarakhand HCWPMS/1438/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous on the grounds of inefficacy due to the passage of time. No substantive legal issue was addressed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
| No | Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPMS No. 1438 of 2024 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, A.C.J. Ms. Rajni Rangwal, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Pawan Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner. |
|||
| 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at the Bar that the present writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. |
|||
| 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. |
|||
| ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, A.C.J.) 23.10.2024 Ujjwal |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
petitioner
- respondent
respondent
Coram
AI extract
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Uttarakhand HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPMS/1438/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court