Criminal revision dismissed as not pressed by the revisionist; counsel stated the revision would not be pursued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 2 .0 1 . 2 0 2 4 |
CRLR No.789 of 2022 Hon’ble Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J. Mr. Mahavir Kohli, learned counsel for the revisionist. |
||
| 2. No one is present on behalf of the respondent nos.2 and 3. 3. Mr. Mahavir Kohli, Advocate, submits that the revisionist does not want to press the present Criminal Revision. 4. Present Criminal Revision (No.789 of 2022) is dismissed as not pressed. |
|||
| ( Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J.) 0 2 .0 1 .2 0 2 4 Pant/ |
Revisionist
Respondent no.2
Respondent no.3
Alok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
