Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
Proposed Criminal Revision dismissed as infructuous
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 3 .0 1 . 2 0 2 4 |
CRLR No.436 of 2023 Hon’ble Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J. Heard Mr. Devang Dobhal, learned for the proposed revisionist and Mr. Latwal, learned Brief Holder for the Stat 2. Mr. Devang Dobhal, Advocate, that the revisionist – accused ha |
counsel Akshay e. submits s been |
||
| acquitted by the Trial Court. Theref | ore, the | |||
| proposed Criminal Revision has infructuous. 3. Present Criminal Revision has not admitted. |
become yet been |
|||
| 4. Proposed Criminal Revision (No 2023) is dismissed as infructuous. |
.436 of | |||
| ( Alok Ku m ar Ver m 0 3 .0 1 .2 0 2 4 Pant/ |
a, J.) |
Unnamed Revisionist
Alok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
