Applicants sought to withdraw a C482 (quashing) application with liberty to surrender before the trial court. The court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn, directing the applicants to surrender within a week and move a bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| C 482 No. 364 of 2024 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Yogesh Upadhyay, learned counsel for the applicants. 2. Mr. Saurabh Pandey and Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants seeks permission to withdraw this C482 application with liberty to surrender before the court concerned. 4. Permission granted. 5. Present C482 application is dismissed as withdrawn. Applicants shall surrender before the trial court within a week and move a proper bail application before it and in case, they move a bail application, the same shall be decided by the trial court after taking into consideration the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case ofSatendra Kumar Antil Vs. CBI (2022) 10 SCC 51. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 05.03.2024 SKS |
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. CBIReferred¶5
Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. CBI (2022) 10 SCC 51 · Who else cites this
Rakesh Thapliyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
