In a bail application under the NDPS Act alleging violation of Section 50, the Single Judge held the case fit for bail and allowed the applicant's release on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties.
Release on bail by executing personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of equal amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No.783 of 2024
Monu ...Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ...Respondent
Present:-
Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, A.G.A. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No. 41 of 2024, under Section 8/22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (“the Act”), Police Station Piran Kaliyar, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.
2
of the case, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
Jitendra
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in a case violating Section 50 of the NDPS Act.
Whether the case involving commercial quantity of narcotics is fit for bail.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Monu
State of Uttarakhand
Ravindra Maithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
