The High Court of Uttarakhand granted anticipatory bail to Arun Agarwal in a case under IPC Sections 120-B, 420, 427, 467, 468, and 471, allowing the application with conditions.
Anticipatory bail application allowed; applicant to appear on bail by furnishing personal bond with two sureties and complying with specified conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 176 of 2024
Arun Agarwal
...Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….Respondent
Present:-
Mr. Pradeep Kumar Chauhan, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Bhaskar Ch. Joshi, A.G.A. for the State. Mr. Ramesh Chand Saini, Advocate for the informant.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant Arun Agarwal seeks anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.0015 of 2024, under Sections 120-B, 420, 427, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station Raiwala, District Dehradun.
2
3
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
01.05.2024
Ravi Bisht
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in a case involving cheating, forgery, and criminal conspiracy regarding property sale.
Arun Agarwal
State of Uttarakhand
Ravindra Maithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
