In a bail application under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC, the High Court of Uttarakhand allowed the applicant's release on bail, finding him independent of the offence despite implicating co-accused allegations regarding a forged website.
The applicant be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No. 768 of 2023
Shander Pal ...Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ...Respondent
Present:Mr. Rahul Consul, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Amit Bhatt, D.A.G. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant Shander Pal is in judicial custody in Case Crime No. 44 of 2023, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC, Police Station Kotwali Dehradun, District Dehradun. He has sought his release on bail.
2
is no way connected with the offence; merely based on the statement of the co-accused, he has been implicated.
Jitendra
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail given his alleged connection to forgery charges based on co-accused statements.
Shander Pal
State of Uttarakhand
Ravindra Maithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
