This Court allowed a bail application filed by Imran, who was in judicial custody for allegedly insulting a religion via social media and using abusive language. The Court granted bail subject to a personal bond and two sureties.
The application was allowed and the applicant was released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No. 1841 of 2023
Imran ...Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ...Respondent
Present:-
Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. K.S. Bora, D.A.G. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant Imran is in judicial custody in Case Crime No. 599 of 2023, under Section 153 (A) (l) (B), 295 (A), 505 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Laksar, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.
2
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 11.12.2023
Jitendra
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail in a case involving insult to religion and use of abusive language.
Whether the FIR allegations warranted the applicant's continued detention before bail.
Whether the non-availability of tested material affected the decision to grant bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Imran
State of Uttarakhand
Ravindra Maithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
