The High Court dismissed a review application challenging a previous judgment in a writ petition. The court held no error was apparent on the face of the record.
The review application filed in the present review pending stock no. 14161 of 2022 was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCC No. 14161 of 2022 (Review Application) In WPSS No.1331 of 2022 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. |
|||
| Mr. S.S. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners/ review applicant. Mr. N.P. Sah, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for respondent no. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the review application filed on behalf of the petitioners as well as the affidavit filed in support thereof. I have also perused the judgment under review. It is settled position in law that review cannot be treated as an Appeal in disguise. An order, which is erroneous, can only be challenged by filing an Appeal. Review of an order can be made only when there is some error apparent on the face of record. It is not a case herein. Learned counsel for the petitioners/ review applicant has also not been able to point out any error apparent on the face of record, which may warrant invocation of review jurisdiction. Accordingly, the review application is dismissed. ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 31.08.2022 Arpan |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is an error apparent on the face of the record in the impugned judgment warranting the exercise of review jurisdiction?
Petitioners
State of Uttarakhand
Respondent No. 5
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
