This is a review disposal where the High Court dismissed the petitioner's Review Application as no ground was made out and concurrently disposed of the delay condonation plea without examining it.
Review Application (MCC No. 5864/2023) dismissed. Delay Condonation Application (IA/ 5865/ 2023) disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No Date |
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|
| 0 3 .0 8 .2 0 2 3 | WPSB No. 204 of 2020 Hon’ble Vipin San gh i, C.J. Hon’ble Rak esh Th apliy al, J. 1. Mr. Aakib Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. |
|
| 2. Mr. Vikas Pande, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/ review applicant. 3. No ground for review is made out. The Review Application (MCC No. 5864/ 2023) is, accordingly, dismissed. 4. Since we have examined the review application on merits, we are not inclined to go into the issue of delay. Delay Condonation Application (IA/ 5865/ 2023) stands disposed of. |
||
| ( Rak esh Th apliy al, J.) ( Vipin San gh i, C.J.) 0 3 .0 8 .2 0 2 3 03 .0 8 .2 0 2 3 Rahul |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether any ground for review is made out in the Review Application.
Petitioner
State of Uttarakhand
Vipin Singh
Rakesh Thapliyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
