This criminal writ petition dismissed as infructuous after the state counsel submitted charge-sheet against specific petitioners and the investigating officer exonerated others during investigation.
None granted; petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 2 .0 4 .2 0 2 2 | WPCRL No. 245 of 2022 Hon’ble Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J. Heard Mr. Prince Chauhan, learned counsel for all the petitioner and Mr. S.S. Adhikari, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State. The learned counsel for the State submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner no.1 Shivam Kumar, the petitioner no.2 Smt. Meena and the petitioner no.3 Smt. Aanchal. The learned counsel for the State further submitted that the petitioner no.4 Smt. Omwati and the petitioner no.5 Veerendra Singh have been exonerated by the Investigating Officer during the investigation. After the said submissions, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that this writ petition has become infructuous. This Criminal Writ Petition No.245 of 2022 is dismissed as infructuous. ( Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J.) 1 2 .04 .2 0 2 2 Pant/ |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition has become infructuous upon filing of charge-sheet and exoneration of some petitioners.
Shivam Kumar
Meena
Aanchal
Omwati
Veerendra Singh
Alok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
