Allowed
Rupali Singh v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCWPCRL/212/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No. |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No. 212 of 2022 Shri Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, ACJ. Shri Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, J. Mr. Mohd Alauddin, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file fresh writ petition with better particulars. Hence, the writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. |
|---|---|---|---|
(R.C. Khulbe, J.) (S.K. Mishra, ACJ.) 02.03.2022 A/- |
Mohd Alauddin
Ramesh Chandra Khulbe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court