Dismissed
State of Uttaranchal v. Smt. Saroj and Another
Uttarakhand HCGA/94/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| GA No. 94 of 2007 Shri S.K.Mishra, J. |
|||
| Mr. J. S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General, assisted by Mr. Rakesh Kumar Joshi and Mr. Pankaj Joshi, Brief Holders for the State/appellant. Learned counsel for the State submits that an affidavit has already been filed on behalf of the State/appellant that both the respondents have died. Hence, the appeal abates. The same is accordingly disposed of. |
|||
| (S.K.Mishra, J.) 01.07.2022 Kaushal |
State
Respondents
S.K. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court