Petitioner's counsel stated the impugned order was complied with; the High Court dismissed the contempt petition and discharged the notices.
Contempt petition dismissed; notices issued to opposite parties discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAI NI TAL
ON THE 3RD MARCH DAY OF, 2022
BEFORE:
HON’BLE SHRI JUSTI CE MANOJ K. TI WARI
Con t em pt Pet it ion No. 1 6 of 2 0 2 2
BETW EEN:
Smt. Shakuntala … Petitioner
(By Mr. Naman Kamboj, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Ram Prasad, Advocate)
AND:
Dr. Pankaj Kumar Panday & others … Opposite Parties
(By Mr. Sushil Vashisth, learned Brief Holder)
JUDGMENT
1. Mr. Naman Kamboj, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that the order passed by Writ Court has been complied with.
2. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt petition is dismissed. Notices issued to the opposite parties are hereby discharged.
( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.)
Aswal
Smt. Shakuntala
Dr. Pankaj Kumar Panday & others
MANOJ K. TIWARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
