Single-judge order dismissing an applicant's recall application for bail cancellation as infructuous, noting the parties have settled the dispute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAC No. 5 of 2022 Hon’ble Ravin dr a Mait h an i, J. None appears for the applicant. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, Deputy Advocate General for the State. Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.2. The respondent no.2-Aslam Saddiq Rana was granted bail by this Court on 15.01.2021. But, on an application of the applicant, the bail was cancelled on 05.09.2022. Thereafter, the respondent no.2-Aslam Saddiq Rana moved an application for recall of the order dated 05.09.2022. Today, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2 would submit that the application has become infructuous because the parties have amicably settled the dispute. In view of the statement given by learned counsel for respondent no.2, the recall application (MCRC No.3/ 2022) is dismissed as infructuous. ( Rav in dr a Mait h an i, J.) 14 .0 2 .2 0 2 3 AK |
Aslam Saddiq Rana
The State
Respondent No. 2
Ravindra Mithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
