Dismissed
Rajesh Kumar v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCBAC/4/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAC No. 4 of 2022 Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J. Mr. Deep Chandra Joshi, learned counsel for the complainant . Mr. K.S.Rawal, learned AGA for the State. Mr. Anil Anthwal, learned counsel for the private respondent. It is informed by the learned counsel for the private respondent that the respondent (accused) has been arrested. In these circumstances, the bail cancellation application has become infructuous. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as infructuous. Recall application being MCRC No. 1 of 2022 also stands disposed of. |
|||
(R.C. Khulbe, J.) 09.12.2022 Kaushal |
R.C. Khulbe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court