The High Court of Uttarakhand granted bail to Rohit Rautela, an applicant in judicial custody accused of attempted murder under Section 307 IPC, concluding the injury was non-fatal and the case was fit for bail.
Release on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No. 1736 of 2022
Rohit Rautela ...Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ...Respondent
Present:-
Mr. H.C. Pathak, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Lalit Miglani, A.G.A. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant Rohit Rautela is in judicial custody in FIR No. 33 of 2022 under Section 307 IPC P.S. Bhimtal, District Nainital. He has sought his release on bail.
2
report, the doctor records that there were three stab wounds. The depth of the stab wound was not noted on 24.05.2022 and in the supplementary medical report also the doctor records that the stab wound did not damage any internal organ; it would have been fatal had it hit the lungs of the informant. It is argued that it is a case for bail.
case of stab wound. It is a serious offence.
3
of the Court concerned.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 09.09.2022
Sanjay
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant, accused of attempted murder under Section 307 IPC with non-fatal injuries, deserves release on bail.
Whether the gravity of the offence and the nature of injuries justify granting bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rohit Rautela
State of Uttarakhand
Ravindra Maithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
