The Special Judge modified a Motor Accident Claim Tribunal award based on a recorded compromise between the parties.
The appeal stands partly allowed and the award is modified as per the terms of the compromise dated 3rd March, 2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| IA No. 2 of 2022 In AO No. 3 of 2022 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. |
|||
| Mr. Mukesh Kumar Kaparuwan, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Sagar Kothari, Advocate, for respondent No. 1. Mr. I.P. Kohli, Advocate, for respondent No.7. This is an Appeal from Order, which was arising out of the award dated 30.11.2021, passed by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal in MACT Case No. 8 of 2020, Smt. Roma and others Vs. Dinesh Singh Rawat and others, by virtue of which, the Tribunal has directed remittance of a sum of Rs.54,70,000/- as compensation payable to the claimants. The Appeal from Order has been admitted. |
|||
| Today the matter is listed on Misc. Application No. 2 of 2022, filed by the learned counsel for the parties, whereby, the parties to the Appeal from order, had placed on record the notarised compromise, which has been entered into between the parties to the Appeal from Order, contending thereof, that the parties to the Appeal from Order, have settled their disputes in terms of |
| the compromise dated 3rdMarch, 2022. This is the |
|---|
| fact, which has been admitted by the learned |
| counsel appearing for the parties. In view of the above, the settlement as |
| arrived at between the parties itself would meet the parameters of Order 23 Rule 3 of the C.P.C. Accordingly, this Appeal from Order would |
| stand partly allowed and the award, in question, |
| would be treated to have been modified to the |
| extent, as per the terms of the settlement, arrived at between the parties. |
| (Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.) Dated 01.04.2022 Shiv |
Smt. Roma and others
Dinesh Singh Rawat and others
Sharad Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
