Dismissed
Akhalak Hussain v. State of Uttarkhand
Uttarakhand HCWPSS/227/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition…
What the court decided
AI extract
OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition (S/S) No. 227 of 2021
Akhlak Hussain and others …........ Petitioners
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand and others …....... Respondents
Present : Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondents.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition on the ground that except petitioner nos.2 and 3, rest of the petitioners did not qualify even the preliminary round of the examination. Petitioner nos.2 and 3 do not want to pursue their career in the examination-in-question.
Sanjay
Akhlak Hussain and others
State of Uttarakhand and others
Ravindra Maithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court