Allowed
Madhavi Sanjay Goswami v. Uttarakhand Ayurved University through Its Registrar
Uttarakhand HCWPSB/464/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPSB No.464 of 2021 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. Hon’ble Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J. |
|||
| Mr. Ashutosh Thakral, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Pradeep Kumar Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. J.C. Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the State. The Modification Application (MCC No.02 of 2021) is allowed. The expression “Assistant Professor” in first paragraph of the order may be read as “Associate Professor”. |
|||
| ( Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J.) ( Man oj K. Tiw ar i, J.) 01.10.2022 SB/ Neha |
Petitioner
State
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Alok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court