Dismissed
Prakash Chandra Sati v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCWPPIL/139/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ON THE 18TH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ON THE 18TH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
ON THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
BEFORE:
HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI
AND
HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA Writ Petition (P.I.L.) No. 139 of 2021
BETWEEN:
Prakash Chandra Sati. ....Petitioner
(By Sri Aditya Singh, Advocate)
AND:
State of Uttarakhand & others. ...Respondents
(By Sri S.N. Babulkar, Advocate General with Sri C.S. Rawat, Chief Standing Counsel, Sri Anil Kumar Bisht, Additional Chief Standing Counsel & Sri Yogesh Chandra Tiwari, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand and Sri Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for respondent no. 2.)
This Writ Petition coming on for hearing this day, Hon’ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. delivered the following Judgment:
JUDGEMENT
Mr. Aditya Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file fresh.
(MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, J.)
(ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.)
Navin
Prakash Chandra Sati
State of Uttarakhand
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Allok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court