The High Court dismissed the writ petition, declared infructuous upon the parties entering into a compromise in the main proceedings, as submitted by the learned counsel.
Dismissed the writ petition as infructuous upon the compromise in main proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPMS No. 954 of 2021 Sh r i S.K. Mish r a, J. Mr. Sagar Kothari, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous, as the main proceeding has come to its logical conclusion on compromise between the parties, and he prays that the writ petition may be allowed to be dismissed as infructuous. Mr. Pramod Bailwal, the learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 3 and Mr. Bharat Tiwari, the learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 6 are also present. They submit that they have no objection if the writ petition is permitted to be dismissed as infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as such. Urgent certified copy of the order be provided as per rules. |
|||
| ( S.K. Mishr a, J.) PV 1 3 .1 2 .2 0 2 1 |
Petitioner
Respondent No. 3
Respondent No. 6
S.K. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
