Dismissed
Siddharth Mehta v. Sri Mayank Mehta
Uttarakhand HCWPMS/530/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WPMS No. 530 of 2014 Shri Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, J. Shri Arvind Vashisht, Sr. assisted by Shri Vivek Pathak, Adv the petitioners. Shri Tapan Singh, Advocate respondents. Shri Arvind Vashisht, lear Advocate for the petitioners submits writ petition has become inf therefore, he may be permitted to the same. He further submits that memo to the above effect. Shri Tapan Singh, Advocate respondents has no objection to it. If memo is filed, the same shall on record. Writ petition is allowed withdrawn. |
Advo ocate for ned that ructu withd he w for be t to |
cate for the Sr. this ous, raw ill a the aken be |
|||
| (S.K. Mis 10.11. SKS |
hra, J 2021 |
.) |
Shri Sanjaya Kumar Mishra
Shri Tapan Singh
S.K. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court