Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a writ petition; the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn upon hearing the counsel's statement at the bar.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; the petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAI NI TAL
ON THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE:
HON’BLE SHRI JUSTI CE MANOJ K. TI WARI
W r it Pet it ion ( M/ S) No. 3 2 6 7 of 2 0 1 7
BETW EEN:
Sri Bhupendra Singh … Petitioner
(By Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, Advocate)
AND:
Bar Council of Uttarakhand & others… Respondents
(By Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, Advocate)
JUDGMENT
1. Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that in view of subsequent development, the relief, as claimed in the writ petition, does not survive, therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition.
2. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.)
Aswal
Bhupendra Singh
Bar Council of Uttarakhand
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
