Dismissed
Sanjay Kanderi v. Karan Bahadur
Uttarakhand HCWPMS/1985/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPMS No. 1985 of 2012 Shri Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, J. |
|||
| Shri P.S. Bisht, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Siddharath Sah, Advocate for the respondents. Shri P.S. Bisht, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this writ petition has become infructuous. He further submits that he will file the memo to this effect during the course of the day. Shri Siddharaht Sah, learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to it. If memo is filed today, the same shall be taken on record. Writ petition is dismissed being infructuous. |
|||
| (S.K. Mishra, J.) 22.11.2021 SKS |
Sanjaya Kumar Mishra
Respondents
Sanjaya Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court