Tahir Hussain Vs Jameel Ahmad@Munni — Writ and Judicial Review | Uttarakhand HC (2021)

Tahir Hussain Vs Jameel Ahmad@Munni — Writ and Judicial Review | Uttarakhand HC (2021)

SL. No	Date	Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures	COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
			WPMS No. 1507, 1505 and 1506 of 2012 Shri Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, J. Shri Bhupesh Kandpal, lea counsel for the petitioners. Shri Sudhir Kumar, Advocate respondents. Learned counsel appearing for petitioners in all three writ petitions some observations of the Court, sub that he wants withdraw all the three petitions with liberty to approach competent Civil Court having pecuniary and territorial jurisdiction. In that view of the matter, Bhupesh Kandpal, counsel for petitioners requests to file memo to effect, which shall form part of the reco All the three writ petitions are allo to be withdrawn with liberty to petitioners to approach competent Court having both pecuniary and territ jurisdiction for ventilating their grievanc If at all the petitioners initiate proceedings before the competent Court, the Civil Court shall proceed with matter strictly in accordance with law shall not prejudice by any observation orders passed by this Court, Revis Court, Appellate Court or the Prescr Authority. (S.K. Mishra 16.11.202 A/-	rned the the , on mits writ the both Mr. the that rd. wed the Civil orial es. civil Civil the and s or ional ibed , J.) 1