The single judge dismissed a criminal writ petition as infructuous after the charge-sheet was filed, vacating an interim order dated 11.09.2020.
Interim order dated 11.09.2020 vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 8 .1 1 .2 0 2 1 | WPCRL No.957 of 2020 Hon’ble Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J. Heard Mr. Navneet Kaushik, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sachin Panwar, learned Brief Holder for the State. Mr. Sachin Panwar, the learned Brief Holder for the State submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed before the court concerned. In view of the above submission, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the present criminal writ petition has now become infructuous. The Criminal Writ Petition No.957 of 2020 is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order dated 11.09.2020 stands vacated. ( Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J.) 0 8 .1 1 .2 0 2 1 JKJ/ Neha |
Petitioner
State
Alok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
