Dismissed
Nazia Yusuf Izuddin v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCWPCRL/45/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCRL No.45 of 2021 Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J.
Ms. Radha Arya, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Kuldeep Rawal, learned A.G.A. for the State.
It is informed by the learned State Counsel that on completion of investigation, charge sheet has been submitted by the I.O. in the matter.
In view of the above, the writ petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(R.C. Khulbe, J.) 20.10.2021
BS
R.C. Khulbe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court