Dismissed
Jamshed v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCWPCRL/437/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPCRL No.437 of 2020 Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J. None is present for the petitioner. Mr. Kuldeep Singh Rawal, learned A.G.A. for the State. Learned counsel for the State submits that as per the instructions, charge sheet has been submitted in the matter. In view of the above submission, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. |
|||
| (R.C. Khulbe, J.) 09.09.2021 Sukhbant |
Petitioner
State
R.C. Khulbe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court