Navin Agarwal v. State of Uttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
None. This court recorded the submission that a charge-sheet had been filed, rendering the petition infructuous, and dismissed it.
None. This court recorded the submission that a charge-sheet had been filed, rendering the petition infructuous, and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPCRL No.344 of 2020 Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J. None for the petitioner. Mr. V.K. Jemini, learned A.G.A. along with Ms. Mamta Joshi, learned B.H. for the State. It is submitted by learned State counsel that on completion of investigation, a charge-sheet has been submitted in the matter. The present petition has thus become infructous and it is dismissed as such. |
|||
| (R.C. Khulbe, J.) 16.11.2021 Rdang |
R.C. Khulbe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court