Dismissed
Jagdish Prasad Yadav v. Anil Kumar Sharma
Uttarakhand HCSA/90/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 1 .1 2 .2 0 2 1 | SA No. 90 of 2021 Hon’ble Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J. Heard Mr. Nalin Saun, learned counsel for the appellants. The learned counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that this appeal has become infructuous. This Second Appeal No.90 of 2021 is dismissed as infructuous. |
||
| ( Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J.) 0 1 .1 2 .2 0 2 1 Pant| |
Alok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court