A High Court judge dismissed a proposed revision petition filed by the petitioners as withdrawn at the admission stage. The court permitted the withdrawal while granting liberty to file an amendment application before the learned trial court.
Withdrawal of the proposed revision permitted with liberty to file amendment application before the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 0 .1 1 .2 0 2 1 | CLR No.74 of 2021 Hon’ble Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J. Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel for the proposed revisionists. Mr. Tarun Lakhera, learned counsel is present. He requested 24 hours time to file his vakalatnama on behalf of the respondents. The learned counsel for the proposed revisionists informed the Court that the proposed revisionists do not want to proceed with this revision and requested to permit them to withdraw this proposed revision with liberty to file amendment application before the learned trial court regarding the irrevocable license. The proposed revision is dismissed as withdrawn at the admission stage; amendment application may be filed according to law and, in case, amendment application is filed, the learned court concerned will consider the same according to law. ( Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J.) 1 0 .1 1 .2 0 2 1 JKJ/ Neha |
Proposed Revisionists
Respondents
Alok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
