This court granted regular bail to the applicant under Section 439 CrPC in a theft case (Sections 379/411 IPC). The court held that without reasons to detain the accused indefinitely, the applicant deserves bail, directing release on personal bond and sureties.
Applicant released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA
15TH NOVEMBER, 2021
FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2830 of 2021
Between:
Sahid. …Applicant
and
State of Uttarakhand. …Respondent
Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Bilal Ahmed.
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. P.S. Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State.
Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.
This bail application has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail in connection with Case Crime No.653 of 2021, registered with Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar for the offence under Sections 379 and 411 of I.P.C.
2
3
ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.
Dt: 15th November, 2021 Neha
3 issues framed by the court
Whether regular bail should be granted to the applicant in a case involving offences under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.
Whether the applicant deserves bail at this stage considering the recoveries and lack of public witnesses.
Whether there is any reason to keep the applicant behind bars for an indefinite period.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Sahid
State of Uttarakhand
Alok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
