Dismissed
Om Prakash Sharma v. Managing Director Uttarakhand Transport Corporation
Uttarakhand HCWPSS/612/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No Date |
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|
| 09.07.2021 | WPSS No. 612 of 2020 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. (Via Video Conferencing) Mr. Mahesh Bhatt, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Lalit Samant, Advocate, for the respondents. This writ petition was disposed of by this Court by the judgment dated 01.07.2020, on the basis of a statement, made by the learned counsel for the respondents that the matter stands covered by an earlier judgment rendered on 26.02.2020, in Writ Petition (S/S) No. 311 of 2020, pertaining to the payment of the gratuity and leave encashment. It is after the expiry of more than one year, a Time Extension Application (MCC/1/2021) has been filed by the respondents. During the arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner has informed that seeking compliance of the judgment dated 01.07.2020, he has filed a contempt petition being Contempt Petition No. 237 of 2021, on which the notices have already been issued to the respondents. In such an eventuality, where the contempt proceedings have already been initiated for non-compliance of the order dated 01.07.2020, no extension, as such, could be granted, as prayed for by the respondents. Hence, in these peculiar circumstances, the Time Extension Application cannot be considered by this Court The Time Extension Application is rejected accordingly. |
|
(Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.) 09.07.2021 Mahinder/ |
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioner
Respondents
Sharad Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court