Sanjay v. State of Uttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
The Hon'ble Court, on the date of hearing, held that a present writ petition became infructuous as the peremptory order directed the Assistant Collector to consider the application under Section 229-D of the U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act in connected writ petitions.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as it has become infructuous due to the dismissal order passed on the same day directing the Assistant Collector to consider the connected applications.