The Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous. The State submitted that one petitioner was exonerated and charge sheets against other petitioners were filed, rendering the present legal challenge unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCRL No.510 of 2017 Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J.
None is present for the petitioners. Ms. Meena Bisht and Ms. Shivali Joshi, learned Brief Holders for the State.
It is submitted by the learned Brief Holder for the State that petitioner Vinod Giri has been exonerated and charge sheet against petitioner nos.2 to 6 has already been filed in the matter.
In view of the above statement, the present writ petition has rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(R.C. Khulbe, J.) 08.07.2019
Sukhbant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous given the exonerations of the petitioner and filing of charge sheets against co-accused.
Petitioner(s)
State of Uttar Pradesh through Secretary, Department of Excise and Taxation
R.C. Khulbe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
