Amit Singh v. State of Uttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
The criminal writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the charge sheet had been filed, making the petition's purpose satisfied. No substantial grounds were addressed.
The criminal writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the charge sheet had been filed, making the petition's purpose satisfied. No substantial grounds were addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCRL No. 2308 of 2018 Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J.
None present for the petitioner.
Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the
State of Uttarakhand.
Learned counsel for the State submits at bar that charge sheet has been filed in the Court, therefore, present criminal writ petition has now become infructuous.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, this criminal writ petition is dismissed being infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Manoj K. Tiwari, J.) 04.09.2019
Aswal
Manoj K. Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court