Inder Singh v. State of Uttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
In a criminal writ petition, the State argued the petition had become infructuous following the filing of a charge sheet. The Court held it was infructuous and dismissed it.
In a criminal writ petition, the State argued the petition had become infructuous following the filing of a charge sheet. The Court held it was infructuous and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCRL No. 2202 of 2018 Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J.
There is no representation for the petitioner.
Mr. Saurabh Pandey, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
Learned Brief Holder submits that, after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed by the police before the Court concerned, therefore, present criminal writ petition has now become infructuous.
In view of the statement of learned Brief Holder, the criminal writ petition is dismissed being infructuous.
Arpan
(Manoj K. Tiwari, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal writ petition is maintainable after the filing of the charge sheet by the police.
Petitioner
State of Uttarakhand
Manoj K. Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court