Dismissed
Shahnaz and Others v. State Of Uttarakhand and Others
Uttarakhand HCWPCRL/1374/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2018 Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J. There is…
What the court decided
AI extract
of 2018 Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J. There is…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCRL No. 1374 of 2018
Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J.
There is no representation for the petitioner.
Mr. Saurabh Pandey, Brief Holder, the respondent/State.
Learned counsel for the State submits that, after completion of investigation, chargesheet has been filed by the Police before the court concerned, therefore, present criminal writ petition has now become infructuous.
In view of the statement of learned counsel for the State, the Writ Petition (Crl) is dismissed as ‘infrutuous’.
(Manoj K. Tiwari, J.) Kaushal 11.09.2019
Unknown
State
Manoj K. Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court