A revisionist's time extension application was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh. No substantive decision on the merits was rendered.
Time extension application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh; liberty granted to file afresh with better particulars
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRLR No. 442 of 2019 With Time Extension Application No. 958/2018 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate for the revisionist.
Mr. Vaibhav Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the respondent.
The Time Extension Application, which has been preferred by the revisionist, is permitted to be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh with better particulars.
26.09.2019
Mahinder/
Mahinder
Respondent
Sharad Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
