Civil revision by revisionists is dismissed as infructuous on a statement by the Senior Counsel for respondents that the matter has been rendered infructuous. No substantive legal proposition established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CLR no. 130 of 2013
Hon’ble Lok Pal Singh, J.
None present for the revisionists.
Mr. V.K. Kohli, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Kanti Ram Sharma, Advocate for the respondents.
Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents makes a statement at Bar that the present civil revision has rendered infructuous.
In view of said statement, the civil revision is dismissed as infructuous.
(Lok Pal Singh, J.) 13.06.2019
Negi
Lok Pal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
