Criminal miscellaneous application filed by Balwant was dismissed on the sole ground that the application was not pressed by the learned counsel for the applicant.
No relief granted as the application was not pressed by the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C-482 No.66 of 2015 Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J.
Mr. B.M. Pingal, learned counsel for the applicant.
Mr. Sachin Panwar, learned Brief Holder for the State.
Leaned counsel for the applicant would submit that he does not want to press the present criminal misc. application.
In view of the above, the present criminal misc. application is dismissed as not pressed.
(R.C. Khulbe, J.) 22.11.2019
Balwant
Balwant
State
R.C. Khulbe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
