The appellant sought permission to withdraw an appeal. The High Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the appeal permitted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AO No. 235 of 2019 Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Mr. Vikas Bahuguna, Advocate for
the appellant.
Mr. M. S. Bisht, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent nos.1 to 4.
Mr. Ajay Singh Bisht, Advocate for the respondent no.5.
After arguing at some length, the learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal.
Permitted to be withdrawn.
The Appeal from Order stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) (Alok Singh, J.) 16.10.2019
Pant
Appellant
State of Uttarakhand
Respondent no.5
Alok Singh
Ravindra Maithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
